Furloughs

It is a rare occurrence that I agree with a course of action of Lou Magazzu. As Freeholder Director he is insisting that county employees take a wage freeze in exchange for a guarantee of no layoffs.  However, if the county had not kowtowed to union pressure and unbalanced contracts in the past, this might not be as much of an issue.

In 2005, the county and unions agreed to a five-year contract with annual raises, the steepest being four and f ive-years out.  This sort of projection that is not in any way tied to economic factors is absurd.  There is no private corporation or business int he world that would ever do such a thing.

And therein lies the problem with public sector unions. The pay scale and benefits in no way mimic the public sector or real world. Public employees that are crying about this wage freeze will not get one iota of sympathy from the public sector person losing their house because Cumberland County has the highest unemployment in the state, and they cannot find a job, and their unemployment benefits have expired.

Contracts need to be negotiated in good faith, by both sides of the bargaining table. Employees must be guaranteed fair treatment. But the taxpayers must be protected also. Benefits must be in line with what the public sector offers, not generous freebies paid for by the taxpayers. Raises must be tied to COLA.

A lot is being said about furloughs by  the county as well as local municipalities.  The plan is to force employees to take seven unpaid days off a year. Yes, every option needs to be considered.   However, I have a better solution.

Most of the workers affected by a furlough are the lower echelon, lower wage earners. These are also the people that would be less likely able to afford that minor loss in take-home pay. Salaried persons do not get paid by the hour or day, but that is where the big savings would come. Also the higher paid persons would be better able to afford losing pay. The problem with both the county and local budgets is that salaries are not the major expense.

Perks and overhead are the areas that need to be considered. Overhead – the cost of running a government building. The savings of shutting down the buildings for one extra day a week are respectable.  California did it, as have many private companies. The plan? Go to a four-day work week of ten hour days for all non-essential departments.

The employees love it because now they have three day weekends every week, and those that commute save in fuel. The savings in energy and overhead of maintaining the buildings is substantial. The public benefits due to longer daily afternoon/evening hours, despite the one day closure.

I suspect that the savings of a four-day work week would exceed anything saved by forced furloughs, and there would be less ill will involved. Then when at the bargaining table the next time, the insurance and employee contributions can be looked at and brought slowly into line with the real world, private sector. Pay increases can be tied to COLA and not some arbitrary number devised by lawyers and union heads without consideration to the people that are actually footing the bills. It is inherently unfair that the taxpayers, the ones that will have to pay for the wages and benefits have absolutely no say at the bargaining table.

I wonder if there is a case for a class action lawsuit? What a precedent that would be? But this is a pipe dream. So, while Lou Magazzu and his friends throw union employees under the bus after vacant promises to get re-elected, the best we can wish for is an honest debate, some give and take, and the hope of a stronger and faster economic recovery.

Advertisements

7 Responses to Furloughs

  1. overeducated says:

    You are incorrect in the assumption of county employees that are salary.
    They are paid a per diem. If they are furloughed they will not receive the per diem, the equivalent of one days pay.

    I do not feel that the burden to fix a 5 million dollar shortfall should be the sole responsibility of 1000 county employees.

    The citizens of Cumberland County elected the politicians that agreed to the contracts and spending that led to this problem. They should be responsible for finding a fix or paying for it.

    Next time, don’t elect the incumbents and make a change, until then, get the change out of your pocket and put it in the county cash register

  2. PaperCut says:

    The only “pipe dream” is the notion that Lou is throwing union people under the bus. Far from it. If the union gives up one penny they will get back five sooner or later. The other “pipe dream” is expecting county employees to do 5 days of work in 4 days. Aint never gonna happen, no way, no how. Wuli should visit some of these government offices some time to see how many desks are occupied and at what hours. maybe hang around a while and listen to all of the phone conversations with friends and family and witness first hand the cover system used by co-workers to game the system. If 40% of the paid hours are actually productive I would be surprised. But who am I to complain? I only pay taxes.

  3. Deep Throat says:

    I seem to remember those billboards with county treasurer Gary Simmerman bragging that the county had the best budget ever in 09 with the maggot.
    Fran Smith who fought so hard for the maggot is silent now that his members are getting the shaft.
    The employee unions have been rewarded for their efforts on behalf of Nelson Thompson their “Union Brother” Sounds more like Cain and Abel.

  4. TheTruth says:

    The unions fought for what they have, plain and simple. You can’t blame them for that and you can’t simply expect them to give it up because they make more or are compensated more than someone in the private sector. Who ISN’T going to go into a negotiation with the mindset that they are going to try to get the most that they can possibly get? Your beef shouldn’t be with the unions, it should be with the elected officials who negotiated the contracts. Elect someone who isn’t going to back down. I can guarantee you that the unions won’t back down either, but that is what arbitration is for. Let a judge decide what is fair compensation.

  5. GoGoCumCo says:

    I have to agree. I don’t see the four days a week schedule working when the rest of the world is still running on a five day a week schedule. Maybe some services, but not most. I also agree that 1000 employees (AKA tax payers) aren’t going to fix a budget shortfall of which we don’t even know the full extent. There are numerous means by which the budget can be worked out..furloughs being one. I think a few days are inevitable for everyone in 2010.

    Prediction…..MaggaZOO eventually raises taxes (inevitable) and immediately blames the county employees………just like a coward….

  6. Oystercracker1 says:

    GoGoCC, don’t you think that was the grand plan of king loonie all along?

  7. GoGoCumCo says:

    Absolutely…..just stating the obvious I guess !!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: