For instance, the EXIF data on this photo tells me the following:
|Camera:||Research In Motion BlackBerry 9000|
|Flash:||No flash function|
|Date:||July 24, 2010 12:22:21PM (timezone not specified)
(11 months, 24 days, 18 hours, 26 minutes, 43 seconds ago, assuming image timezone of US Pacific)
|File Size:||1,200 × 1,600 JPEG (1.9 megapixels)
368,522 bytes (0.35 megabytes) Image compression: 94%
I wonder about the Blackberry – is it privately owned, or did the taxpayers finance it? If the cellphone is county issued, I would wonder if any of the OTHER photos were taken using the same camera?
If you are technically savvy, you can download and save this photo, and analyze the EXIF data yourself – just more confirmation that this info is not made up. Perhaps some Lou-philes out there could correlate the dates of the images – especially the nastier ones, with Lou’s whereabouts when they were taken. I think we could have some fun with this one.
I was threatened by Lou – via a third-party – with legal action. It turns out that Lou lied about his representation, so I can only assume that he was also lying about his promise not to attempt to bring the state attorney general into it if I promised to take down the photos. I said I wanted verification from Lou in writing, since I trust him only as far as I can throw him. Since that promise has not been forthcoming, EVERYTHING, and MORE will be going up.
Next stop, Washington, DC!