County moves to let the State investigate ethics complaints

The AC Press reported on the move by the county freeholders to push ethics complaints off on the state.

Cumberland County will let the state investigate ethics complaints lodged against its elected and appointed officials, work force and government agencies.

While officials say the move is being done as a cost-saving measure, the decision also is related to the August resignation of Louis Magazzu from the Cumberland County Board of Chosen Freeholders.

The Press nailed the real reason on the head, and the freeholders are being duplicitous about their stated rationale for the change. What cost savings could they be referring to? The panel was to be comprised of two freeholders and three county residents. The freeholders get the same salary regardless of whether they participate in the ethics panel or not. The residents would not be working at a salary, unless they were planning on creating yet another “authority” type of panel where political cronies would be reimbursed.

The Press pointed to the real reason – the Republican freeholders repeatedly railed about the refusal of the Democrats to fulfill their duty to create the Ethics Boards as required by county statute. Now that they have a majority, they have to follow through.  With this gutless action, they can pretend that they are taking a stand on ethics reform while in actuality doing absolutely nothing.

Does anyone for an instant believe that the powers that be in Trenton will raise an eyebrow at ethics infractions in Cumberland County? They looked the other way for years and ignored the backroom deals, shady hiring practices and Lou Magazzu’s fake NACo PAC.


2 Responses to County moves to let the State investigate ethics complaints

  1. amused says:

    How much better would it be if the party in power still puts two of it’s own freeholders on the ethics committee and appoints three of their friends? The State couldn’t do much worse. Perhaps they need to restructure it so the party in power is not so isolated.
    Better to have no freeholders and 5 unaffiliated citizens.

  2. WuLi says:

    The worrisome thing is when you have one party that dominates all seats, and two of those foxes, er, freeholders are watching their henhouse.

    Better to have citizens that are of both parties as well as independents comprising the board.

    The state had no time to even listen to the ethics complaints about Lou Magazzu’s fake PAC – he LIED and claimed it was a PAC to get contributions, and the state could not have cared less. The ethics committee would have to be comprised of people that actually give a damn.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: