Terms of Employment

Last week I posted a rumor which, it turns out, is unfounded. Jim Matlock is not resigning, nor has he been requested to do so according to my sources. I do understand that he has been working on updating his resume, as his job position (as well as the others) has been posted by the Freeholders.

My question is this: just how many lawsuits is it going to take before the freeholders wake up and declare that something is amiss in the OEM/911 Call Center?  So far my tally is one federal lawsuit, two state law suits, and four EEOC complaints. Two chiefs and a supervisor resigned under Matlock’s watch. Employees tell me that morale is at an all-time low.

I am certainly not an advocate of the Republicans going in and firing everyone that was appointed due to their Democrat affiliation. Just as I am adamantly opposed to the practice of hiring people as reward for party loyalty despite a lack of qualifications for the job, I am opposed to firing people due to no other malfeasance than belonging to the wrong political party.

A person’s decision to belong to one political party or another, or to be involved in partisan politics or not should not be a litmus test as to their ability to be employed by the local government. It is wrong, and nothing will ever make that right.

However, simply because we have a half dozen employees that may have been given jobs under the wrong pretenses, that is not their fault and they should not be punished for the misdeeds of prior administrations. If somebody offers you a job, you are going to take it. The only criterion that needs to be considered at this time is that of the qualifications of the people to hold their jobs. If, for instance, the State of New Jersey declares an employee “Unqualified” and as a result withholds matching funds towards the salary, then nothing else need be done other than to seek a qualified candidate to fill that position. This is especially true when the public health is involved.

When another employee is placed as a political favor, and his management style has destroyed the efficiency of the department and brought down lawsuit after endless lawsuit, somebody needs to wake up. One lawsuit is one thing – one lawsuit, and I would say there is a chance it is sour milk or retaliation by a disgruntled employee. But when these lawsuits turn into multiples, and when EEOC complaints become active investigations, it is time to suspect more than one bad egg (unless that bad egg happens to be the leadership).

 

Advertisements

3 Responses to Terms of Employment

  1. Wildwitch says:

    I’m so tired of hearing about these lawsuits… Post them so we know there true. Your sources in the past have been wrong.

  2. Keith says:

    Matlock has no reason business being the Director of Public safety , He has no Firefighting, Rescue or EMS experience. Just because he retired from the state police doesnt make him qualified to run the agency that does 9-1-1 Fire and Emergency Medical Service dispatching, The County fire academy, and Emergency Management. If he wants to collect a county paycheck maybe he should run for sheriff or become an undersheriff , because he is not an asset to Fire or Emergency medical Service in cumberland county. He has his allies that will go to bat for him but they are not the majority But they are loud mouths

  3. Keith says:

    Oh yeah I heard a rumor that the county fire marshal, another office under matlocks control , has recenty resigned if it is true could it be because of matlock or another unrelated reason .

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: